July 7, 2004
Posted Without Comment
Jessica Helfand and I were recently in Portland, Maine participating in a symposium and workshop at the Maine College of Art. During our stay, we witnessed the launch of the redesign of the Portland Press Herald. This letter, in response to the paper being slightly downsized by 1.25 inches, was published on June 17, 2004. We offer it here as an example of the absurd (and delightful) ways in which the unsuspecting public experiences design.
To The Editors:
So what do I think of the new smaller sized Portland Press Herald?
I would say there are some good things and some bad things.
I always read my paper at the breakfast table all alone. And wow! There’s a lot more room for my waffles, coffee, juice, etc. That’s good.
But when I finished reading the paper, I spotted a housefly on my refrigerator, so I rolled up the paper and tried to whack it. I missed by about 1.25 inches. That’s bad.
Paul Blaisdell
South Portland, Maine
Observed
View all
Observed
By William Drenttel
Related Posts
Business
Kim Devall|Essays
The most disruptive thing a brand can do is be human
AI Observer
Lee Moreau|Critique
The Wizards of AI are sad and lonely men
Business
Louisa Eunice|Essays
The afterlife of souvenirs: what survives between culture and commerce?
Architecture
Bruce Miller|Essays
A haunting on the prairie
Related Posts
Business
Kim Devall|Essays
The most disruptive thing a brand can do is be human
AI Observer
Lee Moreau|Critique
The Wizards of AI are sad and lonely men
Business
Louisa Eunice|Essays
The afterlife of souvenirs: what survives between culture and commerce?
Architecture
Bruce Miller|Essays